|
at an adjourned regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th ~ay of July
<br />192S, by the following vote, to,wit:
<br />
<br /> AYES, TRUSTEES:
<br />
<br /> NOES, TRUSTEES:
<br />ABSENT, TRUSTEES:
<br />
<br />J. L. McBride, W.J. Kelly, Homer C.
<br />Chaney, Stanley E. Goode, F. L. Purinton
<br />
<br />None.
<br />
<br />None.
<br />
<br />(SEAL)
<br />
<br />ATTEST: E.L. Vegely
<br /> Clerk of the City of Santa Aha.
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 1979
<br />
<br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE
<br />OF STREET IMPROV~MENT BONDS, PURSUANT TO RESOLU-
<br />TION OF INTENTION NO. 183~, DETERMINING THE
<br />DENOMINATION OF SUCH BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR
<br />THEIR ISSUANCE IN ANNUAL SERIES:
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to statute, notice of the filing of
<br /> list of unpaid assessments was duly given in the manner and fo~n
<br /> required by law, that the warrant, assessment and diagram was
<br /> recorded on the 22nd day of May, 1928, for the work and improvement
<br /> made by Gogo and Rados, under that certain contract awarded to them
<br /> on the 5th day of December, 192V, upon portions of South Main Street
<br /> South Sycamore Street, South Broadway, South Birch Street, South
<br /> Ross Street, South Van Ness Avenue, South Patton Street, South
<br /> Garnsey Street, Woodland Avenue, South Flower Street, South Olive
<br /> Street, South Lowell Street, South Towner Street, Delhi Road, Saint
<br /> Gertrude Place and West Edinger Street, as set forth in Resolution
<br /> of Intention No. 1834; and that said warrant, assessment and diagram
<br /> were returned to the Street Superintendent of said City, together
<br /> with a written statement of all payments received upon the maid
<br /> assessment; and after the full expiration of thirty (30) days after
<br /> the recording of said warrant, the said Street Superintendent duly
<br /> made and filed with the City Clerk of said City of Santa Ana, a
<br /> complete list of all assessments unpaid upon the said Assessment,
<br /> ~hich list is now on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said
<br /> City; now upon evidence shown, this City Council determines that the
<br /> assessments therein ms~ioned were then unpaid, the total aggregate
<br /> thereof being the sum of Seventy-seven Thousand Five Hundred Eighty-
<br /> nine and 28/100 Dollars ($77,589.28), and that there has been paid
<br /> sincs.the filing of the list of unpaid assessments by the Street
<br />
<br /> Superintendent the following assessments, to-wit: Assessment No. 6
<br /> Assessment No. 29 for
<br /> . . $4.40
<br />for $4.02; Assessment No. 24 for $4.40,/Assessment No. 41 for $3.67;
<br />Assessment No. 54 for_ $3.66;.
<br />/Assessment No. 104 for $3.66, Assessment No. 353 for $69.62; Assess-
<br />
<br /> merit No. 714 for $69.66; and that there now remains unpaid the sum
<br />
<br />
<br />
|