Laserfiche WebLink
MM GEC)-2 Implementation of Geotechnical Recommendations for Groundwater and Expansive <br />Soils. Project plans, grading specifications, and construction permitting shall incorporate site specific <br />earthwork and ground improvement requirements related to groundwater saturated soils and <br />expansive soils consistent with the California Building Code and City of Santa Ana requirements <br />applicable at the time of grading/construction as stated in a design level geotechnical report and <br />approved by the City's Building and Safety Division. This shall include recommendations related to <br />discovery of groundwater, wet soils, or unstable soils during grading, stabilization, dewatering, fill <br />materials, and foundations. <br />Impact Finding: The Project would be located on expansive soils, as defined in table 1 B-1 B of the <br />Uniform Building Code (1994) but would not create substantial risks to life or property (Draft <br />Supplemental EIR at p. 5-4-12). <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or <br />substantially lessen the significant environmental effect identified in the Draft Supplemental EIR. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: The Project site contains lean and fat clays, and silty sand and poorly - <br />graded sands with interbeds of clays, which have been tested and determined to have a medium <br />to high potential for expansion due to the clay content (included as Appendix G to the Draft <br />Supplemental EIR). The clayey soils are present onsite from the ground surface to approximately <br />25 to 30 feet bgs. Prior to approval of construction, an engineering level design geotechnical report <br />is required to be prepared and submitted to the City that details the project designs that have <br />been included to address potential geotechnical and soil conditions pursuant to the CBC <br />requirements that are included in the City's Municipal Code Chapter 8, Article 2, Division 1, and <br />implemented by Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2. Therefore, due to the need for mitigation <br />to ensure implementation of existing CBC measures, impacts related to Project buildout of the site <br />would be slightly greater than the impact conclusions set forth in the GPU FEIR, which determined <br />that impacts related to expansive soil would be less than significant with implementation of existing <br />regulations (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5-4-1 2). <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />MM GEC)-1 Incorporation of and Compliance with a Design Level Geotechnical Report. As listed <br />previously. <br />MM GEC?-2 Implementation of Geotechnical Recommendations for Groundwater and Expansive <br />Soils. As listed previously. <br />Impact Finding: The Project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological <br />resource or site or unique geologic feature (Draft Supplemental EIR at p. 5.4-1 3). <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or <br />substantially lessen the significant environmental effect identified in the Draft Supplemental EIR. <br />Facts in Support of Findings: As described in Appendix H to the Draft Supplemental EIR, the Project <br />site is underlain by Holocene -aged axial channel deposits, and due to the young age of the onsite <br />soils, it is unlikely that excavation at the surface would impact fossil resources. However, Pleistocene <br />age alluvium may exist below the younger axial channel deposits which could yield fossils. Thus, <br />