Laserfiche WebLink
M B dLL <br />visitors traveling to and from various STRs located throughout the City would result in more diversified <br />traffic patterns as all visitors are not driving to one area. Furthermore, a potential new hotel constructed <br />to meet the demand as a result of the STRs ban would likely be constructed in the area of Santa Ana <br />with the majority of hotels, further concentrating traffic in this area. <br />Health Risk Impacts from Traffic <br />Ramboll performed a preliminary analysis that quantified the health risks from traffic emissions in order <br />to assess the impact that increased hotel use in Santa Ana due to a ban on STRs could cause. A typical <br />roadway with approximately 30,000 average annual daily trips (AADT) results in an excess cancer risk <br />of 40 in a million at a nearby residential receptor."/12113 According to ITE, hotels generate 7.99 trips per <br />day per hotel room.14 There are currently approximately 1,000 Airbnbs in Santa Ana, with other STRs <br />also available. 15 Assuming this ban contributes to 950 more hotel rooms being used, traffic would <br />increase by 7,560 vehicles per day, which results in health impacts that would exceed 10 in a million, <br />which is the SCAQMD CEQA threshold of significance for cancer risk. This scaling approach also does not <br />take into account increased truck traffic associated with deliveries to a hotel that would not occur to an <br />STR. Therefore, banning STRs in Santa Ana could result in an increase in traffic on certain roadways <br />that could be considered significant. If additional truck trips were taken into account, the number of <br />hotel rooms that could cause an exceedance of the threshold of significance for cancer risk could be <br />lower than 950 hotel rooms. <br />It could be assumed that similar trends to cancer risk based on near -roadway traffic exposure would be <br />true for particulate matter and toxic air contaminant emissions. <br />Noise Impacts from Traffic <br />Ramboll evaluated whether a potential traffic volume increase could cause a traffic noise increase that is <br />considered either substantial (per CEQA guidelines) or increases the ambient conditions to a level above <br />the Santa Ana General Plan Noise Element standard (65 dBA CNEL). <br />Traffic noise analyses require specific knowledge of existing and future traffic volumes and vehicle mixes <br />as well as project -related traffic volumes and mixes. In this case, this information is currently unknown. <br />However, the following figure shows the current (2022) exterior levels of noise created by cars, trucks, <br />or trains traveling along roadways and rail lines in the City. The City's noise and land use compatibility <br />standards (see Table N-1) consider exterior levels above 65 dBA (CNEL) to be generally incompatible for <br />residential and other noise -sensitive land uses. <br />If residential or other noise -sensitive areas within the City that are currently below the 65 dBA CNEL <br />level experienced traffic volume increases, specifically due to an increased hotel demand resulting from <br />11 Health impacts obtained from highway 152 from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Mobile <br />Source Screening tool at a distance of 100 feet from the roadway. This was used as a surrogate to estimate <br />general health risks from only traffic. The traffic volume along this road was obtained from CalTrans. <br />12 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. CEQA Roadway Screening Tool - Cancer Risk. <br />Available at: https://data.bayarea metro. gov/Environment/CEQA-Roadway-Screening-Tool-Cancer-Risk/kz4a-ueki <br />13 CalTrans, Traffic Census Program. Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/census. <br />14 ITE. Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition. <br />15 https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana?payment-plan=pro&payment- <br />duration=yearly <br />9/ 14 <br />