My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75F - GP AMEND NO. 2004-06
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/06/2004
>
75F - GP AMEND NO. 2004-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:10 PM
Creation date
7/2/2004 3:17:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75F
Date
7/6/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />needed to meet the park needs of the community. A significant <br />impact to park services would occur when a project or activity <br />increases the demand for additional park facilities. Approval <br />and implementation of the proposed project would not result in <br />the development of any land uses or result in any activities <br />that would increase the demand for park facilities or services, <br />over the current level of demand in the City- Therefore, no <br />significant impacts would occur to park facilities in the City- <br /> <br />XIV. RECREATION <br /> <br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood <br />and regional parks or other recreational facilities such <br />that substantial physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br /> <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require <br />the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, <br />which might have an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />As mentioned above, additional parkland would be needed in Santa <br />Ana to meet current and future park and recreation needs of the <br />community. Without additional parkland and recreational <br />facilities provided, residents would continue to use existing <br />recreational facilities in the City. A significant impact to <br />recreational facilities would occur when a project or activity <br />increases the demand for additional recreational facilities <br />beyond the ability of the City to provide adequate recreational <br />facilities or require the construction of new recreation <br />facilities that could potentially impact the environment. <br />Approval and implementation of the proposed project would not <br />result in the development of any land uses or result in any <br />activities that would increase the demand for recreation <br />facilities or services, over the current level of demand in the <br />City. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur to <br />recreational facilities in the City. <br /> <br />XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Cause an increase in traffic, which is- substantial in <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />street system? <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />1'SF -"37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.