Laserfiche WebLink
related projects would use such resources on a relatively small scale. Additionally, future <br /> development projects, including the Project, would be expected to incorporate energy <br /> conservation features in compliance with applicable regulations, such as the Title 24 standards, <br /> which include the CALGreen Code.The Project would not result in the need for expanded facilities <br /> from SoCalGas, SCE, or telecommunications providers, as the existing capacities for dry utilities <br /> would be sufficient to meet the Project's needs. Thus, the Project's contribution to cumulative <br /> impacts to dry utility services would not be cumulatively considerable, and as such, cumulative <br /> impacts to dry utility services would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.15-38.) <br /> 4.18 WILDFIRE <br /> Threshold W-9: The Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response <br /> plan or emergency evacuation plan. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in no impact to wildfire related to impairing <br /> an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br /> p. 5-13.) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: The Project site is located within the City, which is not located in <br /> or near a state responsibility area or lands classified as a very high fire hazard severity zone <br /> (VHFHSZ). The nearest state responsibility area classified as VHFHSZ to the City is about four <br /> miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge, and the nearest VHFHSZ in a local <br /> responsibility area is about 3.8 miles east at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. <br /> Therefore, the Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or <br /> emergency evacuation plan, and no impact to wildfire would occur. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br /> p. 5-13.) <br /> Threshold W-2: The Project would not, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, <br /> exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant <br /> concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in no impact to wildfire related to <br /> exacerbating wildfire risks and exposing project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a <br /> wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 5-13.) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale:As previously discussed,the Project site is located within the City, <br /> which is not located in or near a state responsibility area or lands classified as a VHFHSZ. <br /> Therefore, the Project would not, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate <br /> wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or <br /> the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. No impact to wildfire would occur. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br /> p. 5-13.) <br /> Threshold W-3: The Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated <br /> infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, <br /> power lines or other utilities)that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result <br /> in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. <br /> i <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 65 of 140 <br />