Item 12 - Agreements for On-Call Real Estate Title and Escrow Services

Home Browse Search

(9) • City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the Proposer's responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City working hours. VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE See Exhibit H — Sample Agreement IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria: CATEGORY POINTS Organization/Completeness of Response o Proposal demonstrates understanding of project and objectives as it 10 relates to the scope of work. o Proposal demonstrates requirements are addressed and adhered to. o Proposal is complete, comprehensive, and well -organized. Qualifications, Capabilities, & Experience The technical qualifications and experience of the organization are adequately described as they relate to the Scope of Work (SOW). o The proposal identifies specific projects completed within the past five 25 (5) years that demonstrate competency of the tasks outlines in the SOW. o The ability to meet the needs and concerns of the City is adequately demonstrated. Key Personnel / Proposed Staffing Proposer demonstrates experience providing type of service required or experience providing similar services o Proposer demonstrates they have the necessary resources, knowledge, skills, experience, and any required licenses / certifications 20 to provide the required services o Proposal provides resumes of experienced personnel that are capable of and devoted to the successful accomplishment of work to be performed under this contract. o Amount and quality of time that the key personnel will eb involved in their respective portions of the project.