My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
03/17/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2026 2:09:12 PM
Creation date
3/11/2026 11:17:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zuniga, Diana <br /> From: Michelle Wright < <br /> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2026 6:32 PM <br /> To: eComment; Zurita, Bianca <br /> Subject: [Request for Community Feedback] Draft - City of Santa Ana Public Art Policy Due <br /> Monday, March 16 by 8am <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br /> As a Resident Artist at the Santa Ana Arts Collective and a recipient of the 2023 Investing in the Artist Grant, I believe it <br /> would be beneficial for the City to consider establishing an unbiased Arts and Cultural Liaison to help bridge <br /> communication between artists and the City. I understand this idea was originally suggested by Skeith DeWine more <br /> than 25 years ago, and it still feels very relevant today. A liaison could help ensure artists are aware of ongoing and <br /> upcoming opportunities while also providing a consistent point of contact who understands both City processes and the <br /> needs of the artistic community. <br /> It may also be helpful for the policy to more clearly emphasize opportunities for public input and input from artists who <br /> work specifically in public art. Because the policy focuses on integrating art into public spaces, perspectives from both <br /> the community and experienced public artists could be valuable in areas such as site selection, design considerations, <br /> and long-term maintenance. <br /> From my own experience with the 2023 Investing in the Artist Grant, project-based insurance coverage could also be <br /> helpful. While insurance costs can be included in the project budget, coverage must already be in place before financial <br /> assistance is released. Offering an option for project-based insurance could remove a barrier and make these <br /> opportunities more accessible to artists. <br /> The section banning AI-generated artwork may also be broader than intended. Many artists use Al tools during <br /> brainstorming or concept development, even when the final work is entirely original. Clarifying that the final artwork <br /> must be created by the artist,while allowing digital tools during early design phases, could avoid unintentionally <br /> excluding artists. <br /> Lastly,the restriction on political or religious imagery may benefit from clarification. Public art often reflects cultural <br /> history, identity, or social issues,which can sometimes intersect with those themes. Clarifying that the intent is to avoid <br /> promotional or partisan messaging could help ensure meaningful cultural expression is not unintentionally limited. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.