Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Attachment "A" <br />and /or the use of trench boxes /shields, which would elongate the construction schedule. Due to these <br />existing utility constraints beneath South Bristol Street, portions of this roadway would need to be <br />closed to accommodate construction associated with this alternative, which has the potential to result <br />in adverse effects to vehicular circulation. Implementation of this alternative would otherwise be <br />similar to the proposed Project during construction conditions. <br />Development of a lift station at Alternative Site No. 13 also would require the City to acquire private <br />property to implement a temporary construction easement, accommodate the proposed lift station, <br />and provide easements for proposed sewer lines. <br />3.4.15.2 Summary Comparison of Environmental Effects <br />The environmental effects of constructing the proposed lift station at Alternative Site No. 13 in <br />comparison to the proposed Project site are shown in Final EIR Table 5 -1 and described in detail in <br />RDEIR Section 5.4.15. This alternative would avoid the Project's significant and unavoidable <br />impact associated with Construction Configuration C.2; however, this alternative would create a <br />significant and unmitigable near -term impact to transportation /traffic due to a LOS deficiency that <br />would occur for approximately 65 days during construction, which is an increase in duration as <br />compared to the twenty -five (25) days of construction during which the proposed Project would <br />create a significant unavoidable impact to transportation /traffic at the South Bristol Street/West <br />Segerstrom Avenue intersection. Impacts to transportation/traffic would also occur when <br />construction activities disrupt left -turn movements, thereby diverting traffic to adjacent intersections <br />or encouraging cut - through traffic in local neighborhoods; such impacts would not occur in <br />association with the proposed Project and would represent a new significant and unavoidable impact <br />to traffic /transportation. As such, impacts to traffic and circulation would be greater at Alternative <br />Site No. 13 as compared to the proposed Project site. Mitigation would not be available to reduce <br />these effects to less than significant levels, as it is not possible to construct this alternative without <br />affecting the travel lanes within South Bristol Street, and the ability to make left turns along South <br />Bristol Street during construction. <br />Total construction air quality /greenhouse gas emissions would be increased under this alternative due <br />to a longer construction period, although average daily construction emissions would be similar to <br />the proposed Project and would be less than significant. In addition, construction - related impacts to <br />water quality and hydrology would be increased under this alternative due to a larger area of impact, <br />although such effects would be less than significant with mandatory regulatory compliance. Long- <br />term odor impacts associated with accident conditions and near -term noise impacts associated with <br />nighttime dewatering activities would be slightly decreased under this alternative, due to the <br />increased distance to nearby sensitive receptors, although as with the proposed Project such effects <br />would be less than significant (with implementation of Mitigation Measures MMs 3.1 -1, 3.3 -1, and <br />3.3 -2). Impacts related to noise, utilities and service systems, and water quality and hydrology (long- <br />term) would be similar to the proposed Project and would be less than significant. <br />3.4.15.3 Finding and Rationale for Alternative Site No. 13 <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make Alternative Site No. 13 infeasible. <br />Alternative Site No. 13 would result in an overall increase in impacts to transportation/traffic as <br />compared to the proposed Project. Although this alternative would avoid the proposed Project's <br />San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR (Project No. 06 -3510) 3 -30 <br />CEQA Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations_ <br />