My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) - 2012
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2022
>
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) - 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2018 3:16:35 PM
Creation date
9/20/2012 3:57:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG)
Contract #
A-2012-080
Agency
FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Council Approval Date
4/16/2012
Expiration Date
4/30/2015
Insurance Exp Date
1/1/2016
Destruction Year
2022
Document Relationships
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) 1A -2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\S
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) 1B - 2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This price proposal is intended to identify for the City every charge associated with <br />providing the services, products and operational system sought by the City and additional <br />efforts offered by the Proposer. <br />The City considers clarity in explanation/description of cost items to be critically important. <br />6.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION & SELECTION PROCESS <br />To assess qualifications in providing the services sought by the City, every Proposer must <br />complete and submit the Proposal Response Form and a Price Proposal Form (Appendix <br />A) or submit a separate response which addresses each item cited in Appendix A for <br />which they are proposing. <br />Step 1. <br />The City's procurement process is based upon open competition through a defined <br />evaluation and selection process. There are required inputs and deadlines to which <br />there are no exceptions. The City will ensure that all Proposers strictly abide by these. <br />It is the Proposer's task to demonstrate its ability to perform the specific services and <br />provide the specific products identified in this RFP. <br />Based on the information provided on the Proposal Response Form (Appendix A), each of <br />the Proposers will be evaluated by a City selection team as to their qualifications and will be <br />assigned a score. Note that proposed price is only one of several criteria. It is not the City's <br />intention to exclude very high bids or to automatically award an agreement to the Proposer <br />of the lowest price for services. <br />The City is attempting to get the best balance of service, value and price. The selection <br />recommendation will be based on the accumulated point score for all criteria. Applicants will <br />be evaluated on the following criteria with possible scoring points: <br />Table C. Evaluation Criteria <br />Criteria Possible Points <br />Qualifications to provide required services 20 <br />including experience/quality of technical service staff, account support <br />staff, & administrative support <br />[key focus: invoicing] <br />References max of three 30 <br />[key focus: client experience with similar type and quantities of equipment <br />under similar service levels complexity] <br />Service Strategy to provide required services 20 <br />including ability and methodology to execute on proposed services <br />Pricing 30 <br />Total 100 <br />City of Santa Ana Page 13 of 39 <br />Exhibit A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.