My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) - 2012
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2022
>
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) - 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2018 3:16:35 PM
Creation date
9/20/2012 3:57:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG)
Contract #
A-2012-080
Agency
FINANCE & MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Council Approval Date
4/16/2012
Expiration Date
4/30/2015
Insurance Exp Date
1/1/2016
Destruction Year
2022
Document Relationships
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) 1A -2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\S
SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. (STG) 1B - 2015
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are a number of quality metrics for this type of work. Here is a list of just a few of them: <br />• <br />Number of successful problem resolutions on the first call <br />• <br />Average/min/max time on the phone with a customer each month <br />• <br />Average/min/max hold time for a customer to speak with the Help Desk <br />• <br />Average/min/max call depth <br />• <br />Average/min/max on-site response time for hands-on resolution <br />• <br />Average/min/max on-site repair time for hands-on resolution <br />• <br />Cost for hardware repairs on a monthly basis and trend analysis <br />• <br />Number of devices serviced multiple times in a given period <br />• <br />Web -based quality feedback mechanism from the user community <br />• <br />Trend analysis on calls to the Service Desk (going up or down) <br />• Many others <br />STG will collect these metrics and analyze them on a regular basis. We will be looking for a positive <br />trend over time starting with the 'as is' situation when this contract starts. <br />STG is dedicated to regular reviews of our processes and procedures to identify areas that require <br />improvement. Our management team is always looking for areas where we can improve and provide <br />our customers with the highest quality service. Many of our process improvement initiatives are <br />employee driven as a result of all employees being committed to providing the highest possible <br />customer satisfaction in all areas of our business. <br />F. Service Level Agreement <br />Is there a system of severity levels used to triage support requests? <br />Yes. See section C -Escalation Procedures above. Each call received by STG is given priority rating. STG <br />applies a Sev1-Sev3 rating to each call, Sev1 being the most severe. <br />Reflecting their commitment to SLA, does the Vendor pay refunds for missing service levels? <br />This is an excellent question and STG hopes that the City will place a significant weight to each vendor's <br />response. It easy to promise good service, but when asked to back it up with financial penalties most <br />companies won't do that. STG is willing to establish meaningful financial penalties for our failure to <br />provide the service as documented in this RFP. <br />Page 24 of 27 <br />Exhibit B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.