Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana Chapter 3. Environmental Impact Analysis <br />3,2 Environmental Resources Found to Have Less- <br />than - Significant Impacts with Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />The following resources were found to have Less- thamsignificant impacts after implementation of <br />mitigation in The Met IS /MND: <br />• Air Quality . Noise <br />• Biological e PublicServices <br />• GeologyandSoiis . Traffic <br />• Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Because the proposed project would restiltin minor development modifications to the previous <br />project, it is expected that impacts would remain relatively the same for the resources mentioned <br />above. A summary of The Met I3 /MND findings is provided, followed by a qualitative discussion of <br />the impacts associated with the proposed. project modifications and significance of the impacts for <br />each of these resources below. Mitigation measures as published in The Met IS /MND are included <br />and have been modified slightly to correct errors in the original document. These corrections do not <br />affect the impact conclusions or change the effectiveness of mitigation. These minor changes are <br />shown in underline and test. <br />3.2.1 Air Quality <br />The Met IS /MND found that the previous project would result in less- than - significant impacts after <br />implementation of mitigation related to the violation of air quality standards. Less-than-significant <br />impacts were found to occur related to conflicts with an applicable air quality plan, a cumulatively <br />considerable increase of criteria pollutants, sensitive receptors, and objectionable odors. <br />The project site is within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), where state and federal air quality <br />standards are occasionally exceeded. Similar to the previous project analyzed in The Met IS /MND, <br />the proposed projectwould continue to contribute to regional air pollutant emissions during <br />construction and operation; however, emissions would be reduced during construction because of <br />the shortened construction schedule (from 22 months to 12 months) and the decreased In the <br />amount of excavation required (front 144,£395 cubic yards to 34,000 cubicyards). Therefore, the <br />proposed project's contribution to existing or projected air quality violations would be lower <br />compared with the previous projectanalyzed in The Met IS /MND. Furthermore, the proposed <br />project would be required to Implement all mitigation measures as proposed in The Met IS /MND, <br />which are listed below. No additional or new significant impacts that were not previously addressed <br />in The Met 1S /MND have been identified, and the proposed project would not represent a <br />substantial change from the previous conclusions In The Met IS /MND. <br />Applicable Mitigation Measures <br />Mitigation Measure AQ -1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City of Santa Ana Planning <br />and Building Agency will ensure that Phase 1. of construction of the proposed project will be <br />extended front 19 weeks to a minimum of 21 weeks, and that the maximum number of truck trips <br />The Met at South Coast 3-2 March 2015 <br />Addendum <br />75A -80 <br />