My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-012 - California Environmental Quality Act
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2016
>
2016-012 - California Environmental Quality Act
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 2:21:31 PM
Creation date
2/23/2016 2:04:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2016-012
Date
2/2/2016
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facts and <br />B, Findings <br />The City finds that: <br />The Heritage Mixed Use project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, <br />significant cumulative impacts related to geology and soils, or significant cumulative impacts related to <br />soil erosion. Thus, these geology and soils related impacts would be less than significant, and no <br />mitigation measures arc necessary, <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />A. Facts <br />I. The project would not result in substantial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during construction. <br />The project's total estimated GHG emissions from construction would be much less than the <br />emissions threshold. As a result, GHG emissions related to construction activities would be less <br />than significant. <br />2. The project would not result in conflict with a California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping <br />Plan policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br />Out of the Recommended Actions contained in CARB's Seeping Plan, the actions that are most <br />applicable to the project would be related to energy efficiency, green buildings, and water use <br />efficiency, The project would be designed to comply with the CalGreen Code to ensure that <br />resources (energy, water, etc.) would be used efficiently. Therefore, the proj ect would result in less <br />than significant impacts related to CARB's Scoping Plan. <br />3. The proj ect would not result in conflict with a Southern California Association of Governments <br />(SCAG) 2012 -2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Susta suable Communities Strategy (RTP /SCS) <br />policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The project would <br />be consistent with the applicable RTP /SCS goals, which includes goals related to the protection of <br />the environment and health of residents by improving air quality and encouraging active <br />transportation (non - motorized transportation, such as bicycling and walking). The project is <br />consistent with this goal because it would include bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between the <br />onsite residential, retail, restaurant, park, recreation, and office uses. In addition, applicable <br />RTP /SCS goals include encouraging land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and non- <br />motorized transportation, The project is consistent with this goal because it is located adjacent to <br />existing public transportation that provides connectivity to nearby regional Metrolink transit, <br />B. Findings <br />The City finds that: <br />The heritage Mixed Use project would not result in substantial greenhouse gas emissions during <br />construction. In addition, the project would not result in a conflict with any applicable CARD Seeping <br />Plan or SCAG 2012- -203.5 RTP /SCS policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />The Hodtgo Mixed Use Project t t ESAI 140730 <br />Statement of Fecls and FlncIngs September 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.