My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - AMEND ZONING 2001 W MACARTHUR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
10/03/2017
>
75B - PH - AMEND ZONING 2001 W MACARTHUR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 5:09:37 PM
Creation date
9/28/2017 4:44:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
10/3/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2NYIRONYENTAL IUPAOT REPORT ADDENDUM ARMSTAOHO RAN 011 RBVUEU PROJECT,'fl P.PTP.MFER 8619 SAHTAAHA. CALIFORNIA <br />significant Ievcl. TheCcniDed FIR also concluded that the Approved Project would have a less <br />than'sigitifl ant impael relatcd to the: apacity of downstream 8loimdr3ins with implementation of <br />Mitigation Measures HYi)-1 through HYD -3. The Revised Proiect would not result in new <br />significant impacis beyond those id(nti tied in the Certificd FIR. No new mitigation is required. <br />d) Refer to Response 2.16(b). The relatively moderate increase in water use from implementation of <br />dne Revised Project, as compared to the Approved Proj"t„would not necessitate new or <br />expanded water entitlements, and the City would be able to accommodate the increascxi demand <br />for potable water. Therefore, incremental water demand incrca,§cs from the Revised Project would <br />be within existing and projected water supplies and would not require new or expanded <br />entitlements. The Revised Project would not result in h6 msigniificantimpacts beyond those <br />identified in the -Certified FIR. No new mitigation is required. <br />c) Refer to Response 2.16(6): Although the Revised Project would increase wastewater demand on <br />site, the increased wastewater flows from the Revised Project would be within the design capacity <br />of the Reclamation Plant No. 1. Therefore, the wastewater treatment provider would have <br />adequate capacity to'serve the Revised Project's Projected demand in addition to the provider's <br />existing commitments. The Revised Project would not result in new significant impacts beyond <br />those identified In the Certified EiR. No new mitigation is required. <br />t} Solid waste generated in the Project area is collected by WasteManagement acid is taken to the <br />Sunset Environmental Transfer Station, located in hTine. From the transfer station, waste is taken <br />to the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine."Chis landfill is•pennitted asti Class III hindfill, and <br />as such, can accept all types of inonhazardow municipal solid waste for disposal. The Bowerman <br />Landfill is permitted to accept 8,500,tous of waste per day and has projected capacity until the <br />ycarl(153.1 Following its closure in 2053, it is anticipated that solid waste from thesite would be <br />disposed of,at the Prima Deshceha LandGll,in San Juan Capistrano, which is permitted to accept <br />4,000 tons per day of waste and has an anticipated closure daieof2067 2 According the <br />California integrated Waste Xfanagenient Board (CiWNIB); a standard generation rate of i ton <br />per person per year can be used to estimate a project's solid waste generation. Thcrefcre, the <br />addition of 185 persons under the Revised Project would result in asolid waste.gencralion of 185 <br />tons per year, or 0.51 tons per day, which is 0.006 percent and 0.01 percent ordi8 available daily <br />capacity of the Bowerman Landfill and Prima peshecha Landf Il, respectively. The Revisal <br />Project would reduce the size o f the church campus which would reduce -solid waste generated <br />from this use. Using the satne.standard, the Certified FIR concluded that the Apprived Project <br />would result in a solid waste generation of 710 tons per year, or 1.9 tons per day. The Certified <br />EIR also concluded that the Approved Project's increase in "solid waste would be within the <br />County landfill capacity. The Revised Project would also be required to comply with the City <br />recycling program for residential uses to further reduce the Project's solid waste demand. Similar <br />to the Approved Project, the Revised Project would he served by a landfill with sufficient <br />permitted capacity to accommodate its solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, the Revised Project <br />would result in a less than significant impact to Solid waste and landfill facilities, and <br />1 <br />Orange County Waste and Recycling, Frank R. Bosbennan Landfill, <br />lato:!iwww.oclaudflls.cola.+laadfiilliaciiveibowerman(acee'ssed`September 1, 2017). <br />Orange County Waste and Recycling, Prima Dcshecha Landfill, <br />http:lleclandn"IIs.coni']andfill/aeliveiclesheeaa (accessed September 1, 2017), <br />P98t101 KMAdiERdnm4Addemtnui.llxs .,D9.11511 A 2-73 <br />75B-122 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.